Validating insights that fall into social desirability bias

Consumer insights often present topics that deal with socially undesirable situations. These statements can tap into areas such as social preconceptions, the need to fit into a group or social image desires. In these cases, such insights may fail to validate, not necessarily because they don’t resonate with consumers or are not true, but rather because social desirability bias leads to low identification with the insight. In other words, low scores can be caused by the reluctance to admit embarrassing or socially unaccepted situations.
As this was the case in specific innovation platforms (e.g. consumption of alcohol for its ‘buzz’), we decided to collaborate on a taboo-focused research, to better understand how to counter this bias.
Together with Heineken, we set up an insight validation study aiming at testing different formulations of insights previously identified as ‘taboo insights’ which had failed validation. Three test cells were set-up:

  1. Original taboo insight (control cell)
    Example: ‘When in a disco, I want to fit in as one of the crowd…
  2. Positioning the insight in a positive emotional context
    Example: ‘When going out I enjoy that feeling of being part of a group…
  3. Presenting the insight in the third person, with even more context, through storytelling
    Example: ‘When going out we’re usually just sharing good times and catching up….

Taboo insights_quotes
The results were quite clear. Taboo effect can be minimised: whilst performing equally on all other KPIs, the Consumer Relevance KPI increases when positive (test cell 2) or storytelling (test cell 3) formulations are used.
A second confirmed hypothesis was that asking the relevance question in the third-person perspective (‘Do you think others would personally identify with this insight?’) would lead to higher Relevance scores, specifically in these insights. Since then, this question has been integrated in our studies, allowing the identification of potential taboo insights, in the case where considerable differences are observed versus the first-person identification question results.
Taking everything into account, taboo insights can and should be tested. Having this in mind, it is important to minimise the social desirability bias impact, by re-formulating the insights in a positive manner or by providing a storytelling context – naturally remaining faithful to the core insight idea.
Want to find out more about how insight validation can help you unlock the insights with the greatest innovation, activation or branding potential? Read our free paper on Digging for Gold: How to select those consumer insights that will change your business.

You might also be interested in

InSites Consulting Rotterdam is moving up

InSites Consulting Rotterdam is moving up!

Our Rotterdam team moved up to a new office, on the 8th floor of the Eurogate III building (Watermanweg 40-42),…

What is advertising effectiveness?

It’s Effie season, but what is ‘advertising effectiveness’?

When we think about awards for advertising, we probably think of grand events celebrating the cinematic and creative genius that…

Missed Webinar February?

In this fast-paced reality, we know your time is precious. To suit your busy lifestyle, our Sydney team hosted two…